• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Animal Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 62 (2025)
Volume Volume 61 (2024)
Volume Volume 60 (2023)
Volume Volume 59 (2022)
Volume Volume 58 (2021)
Issue Issue 3
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 57 (2020)
Volume Volume 56 (2019)
Volume Volume 55 (2018)
Volume Volume 54 (2017)
Volume Volume 53 (2016)
Volume Volume 52 (2015)
Volume Volume 51 (2014)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2011)
Volume Volume 47 (2010)
Volume Volume 46 (2009)
Volume Volume 45 (2008)
Volume Volume 44 (2007)
Volume Volume 43 (2006)
Volume Volume 42 (2005)
Volume Volume 41 (2004)
Volume Volume 40 (2003)
Volume Volume 39 (2002)
Volume Volume 38 (2001)
Volume Volume 37 (2000)
Volume Volume 36 (1999)
Volume Volume 35 (1998)
Volume Volume 34 (1997)
Volume Volume 33 (1996)
Volume Volume 32 (1995)
Volume Volume 31 (1994)
Volume Volume 30 (1993)
Volume Volume 29 (1992)
Volume Volume 28 (1991)
Volume Volume 27 (1990)
Volume Volume 26 (1986)
Volume Volume 25 (1985)
Volume Volume 24 (1984)
Volume Volume 23 (1983)
Volume Volume 22 (1982)
Volume Volume 21 (1981)
Volume Volume 20 (1980)
Volume Volume 19 (1979)
Volume Volume 18 (1978)
Volume Volume 17 (1977)
Volume Volume 16 (1976)
Volume Volume 15 (1975)
Volume Volume 14 (1974)
Volume Volume 13 (1973)
Volume Volume 12 (1972)
Volume Volume 11 (1971)
Volume Volume 10 (1970)
Volume Volume 9 (1969)
Volume Volume 8 (1968)
Volume Volume 7 (1967)
Volume Volume 6 (1966)
Volume Volume 5 (1965)
Volume Volume 4 (1964)
Volume Volume 3 (1963)
Volume Volume 2 (1962)
Volume Volume 1 (1961)
SOMIDA, R. (2021). COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 58(1), 29-33. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2021.57448.1007
Rasha Abdelhamed SOMIDA. "COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS". Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 58, 1, 2021, 29-33. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2021.57448.1007
SOMIDA, R. (2021). 'COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS', Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 58(1), pp. 29-33. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2021.57448.1007
SOMIDA, R. COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 2021; 58(1): 29-33. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2021.57448.1007

COMPARISON OF THREE NONLINEAR MODELS TO DESCRIBE THE GROWTH CURVE OF HOLSTEIN-FRIESIAN BULLS RAISED UNDER EGYPTIAN CONDITIONS

Article 4, Volume 58, Issue 1, January 2021, Page 29-33  XML PDF (266.13 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejap.2021.57448.1007
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
Rasha Abdelhamed SOMIDA email
Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, 63514 Fayoum, Egypt.
Abstract
The current study aimed to estimate the growth curve parameters through three non-linear models (logistic, Gompertz and Richards) to determine which model best fits the data. A total number of 1566 monthly live weight records of 87 Holstein- Friesian bulls collected between 2017-2019 from a Holstein-Friesian herd cattle that belongs to the Association of Livestock Development (EL- Lahhamy farm), located thirty kilometers west of Fayoum governrate. In this work, the parameters of studied models, asymptotic weight (A), Constant of integration (b), and the maturation rate (K) ranged from 626.15 kg to 879.82 kg, 2.708 to 11.08, and 0.0035 to 0.008, respectively. According to the studied parameters of growth functions, Gompertz reached the highest numerical estimated value for (A) and the Logistic function had the lowest value. Parameter (K) estimate by the Gompertz model was similar to that obtained by the Richards model; both values were lower than those attained through the Logistic model (0.008). The inflection point traits, time at Point of inflection (IPT) and weight at Point of inflection (IPW) estimates ranged from 300.64 kg to 314.59 kg and 323.92 days to 336.14 days, respectively. The Richards model has the highest estimates of IPW and IPT compared to the other models, also it had the best adjustment according to model goodness of fit criteria, by having the lowest values for Akaike information criterion (AIC), Schwarz Bayesian information criterion( BIC), Mean square error (MSE) and highest : coefficient of determination (R 2 ) 82236.80, 83265.51, 317.37 and 0.9983.
Keywords
Growth curves; Gompertz; Richards; Logistic; Holstein-Friesian bulls
Statistics
Article View: 229
PDF Download: 533
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.