• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Egyptian Journal of Animal Production
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 62 (2025)
Issue Issue 2
Issue Issue 1
Volume Volume 61 (2024)
Volume Volume 60 (2023)
Volume Volume 59 (2022)
Volume Volume 58 (2021)
Volume Volume 57 (2020)
Volume Volume 56 (2019)
Volume Volume 55 (2018)
Volume Volume 54 (2017)
Volume Volume 53 (2016)
Volume Volume 52 (2015)
Volume Volume 51 (2014)
Volume Volume 50 (2013)
Volume Volume 49 (2012)
Volume Volume 48 (2011)
Volume Volume 47 (2010)
Volume Volume 46 (2009)
Volume Volume 45 (2008)
Volume Volume 44 (2007)
Volume Volume 43 (2006)
Volume Volume 42 (2005)
Volume Volume 41 (2004)
Volume Volume 40 (2003)
Volume Volume 39 (2002)
Volume Volume 38 (2001)
Volume Volume 37 (2000)
Volume Volume 36 (1999)
Volume Volume 35 (1998)
Volume Volume 34 (1997)
Volume Volume 33 (1996)
Volume Volume 32 (1995)
Volume Volume 31 (1994)
Volume Volume 30 (1993)
Volume Volume 29 (1992)
Volume Volume 28 (1991)
Volume Volume 27 (1990)
Volume Volume 26 (1986)
Volume Volume 25 (1985)
Volume Volume 24 (1984)
Volume Volume 23 (1983)
Volume Volume 22 (1982)
Volume Volume 21 (1981)
Volume Volume 20 (1980)
Volume Volume 19 (1979)
Volume Volume 18 (1978)
Volume Volume 17 (1977)
Volume Volume 16 (1976)
Volume Volume 15 (1975)
Volume Volume 14 (1974)
Volume Volume 13 (1973)
Volume Volume 12 (1972)
Volume Volume 11 (1971)
Volume Volume 10 (1970)
Volume Volume 9 (1969)
Volume Volume 8 (1968)
Volume Volume 7 (1967)
Volume Volume 6 (1966)
Volume Volume 5 (1965)
Volume Volume 4 (1964)
Volume Volume 3 (1963)
Volume Volume 2 (1962)
Volume Volume 1 (1961)
Abo Bakr, S. (2025). INFLUENCE OF SUPPLYING GINGER POWDER ON PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF WEANED LAMBS. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 62(2), 135-145. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2025.350788.1099
S. Abo Bakr. "INFLUENCE OF SUPPLYING GINGER POWDER ON PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF WEANED LAMBS". Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 62, 2, 2025, 135-145. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2025.350788.1099
Abo Bakr, S. (2025). 'INFLUENCE OF SUPPLYING GINGER POWDER ON PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF WEANED LAMBS', Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 62(2), pp. 135-145. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2025.350788.1099
Abo Bakr, S. INFLUENCE OF SUPPLYING GINGER POWDER ON PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF WEANED LAMBS. Egyptian Journal of Animal Production, 2025; 62(2): 135-145. doi: 10.21608/ejap.2025.350788.1099

INFLUENCE OF SUPPLYING GINGER POWDER ON PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE AND CARCASS CHARACTERISTICS OF WEANED LAMBS

Article 6, Volume 62, Issue 2, May 2025, Page 135-145  XML PDF (463.8 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/ejap.2025.350788.1099
View on SCiNiTO View on SCiNiTO
Author
S. Abo Bakr email
Animal and Poultry Production Division, Desert Research Center, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Twenty-one weaned Barki lambs, aged between three to four months with an average weight of 27.26 kg ±0.72 kg, were used to study the effects of two different levels of ginger powder (Zingiber officinale) on lambs performance and carcass attributes. The lambs were divided into three groups (7lambs/group). The first group was used as a control (CR) was provided a basal diet consisted of a concentrate feed mixture (CFM) and alfalfa hay (AH) without any supplementation. The second and third groups received the same basal diet, but with ginger powder supplementation added at 3 g/h/d (LLGP) and 6 g/h/d (HLGP), respectively. Feed was offered as 70% CFM of the total nutrient requirements during experimental period (105 days), while AH was offered as 30% from total rations. The results showed that the lambs fed different levels of ginger showed an increase in average daily gain by 11.2% and 9.5%, respectively, in comparison to the control group. Supplemented groups showed higher feed efficiency by 13% and 6% for LLGP and HLGP, respectively than control. Moreover, carcass properties for LLGP lambs were significantly higher for some carcass traits compared to CR. All of the ruminal and hematological parameters were within the normal range. It could be recommended that the use of 3 g/h/d ginger powder enhanced growth performance, nutrient utilization, and improve carcass characteristics, besides improving economic efficiency from Barki lambs.
Keywords
Lambs; ginger powder; growth performance; rumen and blood parameters; carcass traits
Main Subjects
Nutrition
Statistics
Article View: 93
PDF Download: 98
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.